May 11, 2018

Israel launched waves of air attacks and ground shelling on a score of alleged Iranian military positions in Syria this week.   Was this a big step forward in the plan by Israel’s leader Benjamin Netanyahu and his ally Donald Trump to provoke a major war with Iran?

It certainly looks so.  The US, Saudi Arabia and Israel all recently suffered a stinging defeat in Syria. Their campaign to overthrow the Assad government in Damascus by using the rag-tag ISIS movement, then Sunni Muslim jihadist wild men, was defeated by the Syrian Army, backed by Russian air power, Lebanon’s Hezbollah and some Iranian militia groups and army advisors.

Israel now claims to have wiped out more than a score of Iranian positions in Syria.  As far as we can tell, these were minor logistics or communications facilities, not the backbone of a supposed Iranian offensive against Israel.

In fact, the alleged Iranian rocket barrage was directed at the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights that were illegally annexed and occupied after the 1973 Arab-Israeli War and are still held, legally, as part of Syria. Israel is very nervous about having world attention drawn to its continued occupation of the strategic Golan Heights from which Israeli heavy artillery can reach Damascus.

But now that the Trump administration has fallen fully under the influence of the pro-war neocons, an attempt to overthrow the Iranian government appears highly likely, using both military intervention and intensified economic warfare. 

Iran has been under siege by the US since the American/British installed shah was overthrown by a popular revolution in 1979. The CIA and Britain’s MI6 have mounted numerous attempts to oust the Islamic Republic and re-install a client ruler.

Ironically, the ‘democratic’ western powers – the US, Britain and France – rely on medieval monarchs and dictators to control the Mideast while democratic politicians and movements are ignored.  Iran, in spite of its many rigidities and failings, remains one of the region’s more democratic states.   Ask our Saudi or Kuwaiti allies when was the last time they held a real election?  

The failure of western intelligence services to provoke serious uprisings in Iran (or Russia), means that the military option is increasingly tempting.   This probably means provoking military clashes with Iran in the Gulf leading to full-scale attacks on its nuclear infrastructure and industry.   US warplanes and warships are actively probing Iran’s borders.  In addition, US forces are getting ever more deeply involved in the Yemen War.

When the US last considered a major attack on Iran during the Bush years, the Pentagon (which opposed the idea) estimated it would need 2,800 air strikes against Iran on Day One alone.   

Many of the same war party crowd that engineered the 2003 US invasion of Iraq are now running the Trump administration.  Their goal is to cripple Iran and leave the Mideast to joint Saudi-Egyptian-Israeli control.     

Recall President George W. Bush’s assertion that once he had crushed Iraq the next targets of US military intervention would be Lebanon, Syria, Iran and then Pakistan.

Invading Iran would not be easy.  Iran has very little capability to project power beyond its borders.  Its air force, artillery and tanks are decrepit.  America controls the skies from Morocco to Afghanistan.  Iran is vulnerable to raids and small incursions but subjugating this large, mountainous nation of 80 million would be very difficult.

In fact, and Iranian Revolutionary Guards commander once told me, ‘let the Americans invade. They will break their teeth on Iran.’  Over-confidence, of course, but he had a point.  Fighting on the defensive in urban areas, Iran could offer fierce resistance. 

America’s imperial machine, like its British Imperial predecessor, likes small, easy wars against small, backwards nations.  Iran would be very different. 

As we have just seen with North Korea, Iran’s best survival strategy, short of security guarantees by Russia and China, would be to race to produce a small number of nuclear weapons to deter attacks by the US and Israel.  Europe, which co-sponsored the Iran nuclear act and is now humiliated by Trump reneging on the deal, is too weak and disorganized to guarantee the pact and stand up to Washington.  This is too bad.  Now would have been a fine time for the EU to assert its independence from US hegemony and begin building its own independent European military forces.

Copyright  Eric S. Margolis 2018


This post is in: Iran, Israel, USA


  1. Raj Sathya says:

    First of all why should Iran must send rockets to Golan Heights? Since when Iran became the brand ambassador for Syria? What Irans business in Syria? Here is the answer.After the islamic revolution in 1979, Iranian leaders cited Syria is Irans 35 th province.The Syrian city Zabadani is vitally important to Assad and to Iran because at least as late as June 2011 the city served as the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps logistical hub for supplying Hezbollah.Iran had 2000 to 3000 IRGC officers stationed in Syria.According to U.N.panel in May 2012 Iran supplied arms to Syria despite a ban on weapons exports by the islamic republic.The report investigated three large illegal shipments of Iranian weapons over the past year.According to reporter Robert Fisk of The Independent Iran send 4000 troops to aid Syria and proposed to open a new Syrian front against Israel in the Golan Heights in order to fulfill the vision of late Khomeini who wanted to wipe out Israel from the region. Khomeini was the spiritual Admiral for the Iranians and to destroy Israel was their primary target.The Gatestone Institute estimated that as of late 2016, Iran controlled over 70,000 troops deployed in Syria ( 15,000 soldiers of the Iranian military,20,000 members of Liwa Fatemiyoun, 20,000 Iraqi Shia militiamen in ten different groups , 10,000 Lebanese Hezbollah fighters,and 5,000 to 7,000 Pakistani and Palestinian militiamen) Sending 20 rockets to Israel by the Iranian Quds forces based in Syria is clearly a provocation and attacking Israel is asking for trouble. After all the vision of invading and destroying Israel was DIED when Khomeini DIED.

  2. Steve_M. says:

    The one thing that might well stop the US from leading an invasion of Iran would be a serious threat of intervention by Russia, which Eric hints at in last paragraph of his article. This is where Putin might well choose to draw a line in the sand and threaten Trump sufficiently to make the US back away from a head-on confrontation. The risk of that, however, is that Israel might well be tempted to act on its own. Don’t forget that Netanyahu is probably anxious to create a major distraction of some kind from the criminal investigation that has been swirling around him.

  3. The fact all the American media declares Iran the aggressor in all of this proves one of the lessons learned in Vietnam is the importance of the war manufacturers to control all of the media.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.