February 15, 2014

Democracy can be so inconvenient. Take Switzerland, the closest thing the world has to a perfect democracy.

Switzerland’s eight million citizens vote by referendum on all major issues. The Swiss cantons have made key decisions this way for over eight hundred years.

Last week, Swiss voters decided by a razor-thin 50.3% to begin limiting immigration from the European Union within three years, perhaps much sooner. The vote in non-EU member Switzerland sent shock waves across Europe and brought a storm of abuse down on the Swiss.

In recent years, the Swiss have signed a number of agreements with the EU harmonizing Swiss law with Europe that allowed unfettered Swiss commercial access to the European Union. Now, 56% of Swiss exports go to the EU.

The Swiss grudgingly agreed to adhere to the EU’s basic tenet of free movement of citizens across the EU’s member states.

As a one-time Swiss resident, I found it surprising that Switzerland let commercial concerns outweigh the nation’s intense devotion to independence and, often, isolation. During the Renaissance, the Swiss battled ferociously against the Holy Roman Empire (Austria) and Burgundy to secure their independence. But, then again, we just saw Swiss banks betray their clients by revealing their secret accounts to the US government.

Since then, armed neutrality guaranteed Swiss independence. Threatened in 1939-40 by invasion from Nazi Germany and Fascist Italy, the Swiss mobilized 700,000 citizens soldiers, honeycombed the high Alps with hidden fortifications, and were ordered to leave their families behind and fight to the death from the mountains. The Germans and Italians wisely decided to leave the Swiss alone.

Faced by possible Soviet invasion during the Cold War, the Swiss further expanded their top secret fortress system, much of which I was allowed to see a decade ago.

After years of debate, the Swiss reluctantly decided to amalgamate with the European Union while remaining apart politically and monetarily. But as a result of joining the Schengen Agreement that did away with many internal European borders, Switzerland further opened its doors to non-Swiss.

The result, unsurprisingly, was a flood of workers and executives, primarily from France, Italy and Portugal.
Switzerland has always had a labor shortage, particularly so for menial work and services. During the 1960’s, the Swiss maintained a rigid quota system for foreign workers that often denied them the right to bring their families.

Today, 23-25% of Swiss residents are non-Swiss. They have filled many vacant jobs and the upper ranks of finance and technology, but they are also straining housing, schools, transport and public services. A quarter of the population foreign-born is simply too much for this small, already crowded nation.

Worse, a flood of Bulgarians and Romanians now threatens to descend on Switzerland. For hundreds of thousands of East European gypsies (Roma), rich Switzerland offers generous welfare and myriad opportunities for criminals. France, plagued by street crime and robberies by Roma, offered a frightening example to the ultra law-abiding Swiss.

So Swiss voters, led by the xenophobic, right-wing People’s Party with roots in German-speaking rural Switzerland, opted to limit immigration to those truly needed by the Swiss economy. Details have yet to be revealed.

But the rest of the EU is crying bloody murder, accusing the unloved Swiss of some sinister neo-fascist plot to undermine the Union. Behind all the uproar is the fear in Brussels that the Swiss clampdown will embolden increasingly influential rightwing, anti-EU parties in Britain, France, Holland, Austria, Greece, and Spain who have brewed a weird ideology combining hatred of Islam with hatred of the European Union and calls for secession. Holland’s neo-facists are of particular concern (the largest numbers of non-German Waffen SS volunteers came from Holland and Belgium).

So far, only the Swiss have had the courage to stand up and say “no more uncontrolled immigration.” There is nothing sinister about this: the US and Canada do the same. Swiss voters were right. There’s no more room in their Alpine paradise. More immigration threatens Switzerland’s democracy and admirable traditions. Still, it’s likely some sort of compromise on this issue will be worked out.

Europe made a huge mistake opening its doors to the street people of Eastern Europe. Many Europeans envy the Swiss.

copyright Eric S. Margolis 2014

This post is in: Europe, Switzerland


  1. I have always admired the tolerance Europe has displayed toward immigration trends, some of which have undoubtedly created social and economic problems. Growing up in Dubai, a metropolitan city in an economically vibrant region where foreigners make up over 80% of the local population, I remember how benevolent the local authorities were toward law abiding residents and utterly harsh, with no compromise, toward those who broke the law or engaged in crime; jail followed by deportation was the norm for all nationalities. The break-up of the Soviet Union brought many criminal elements from the eastern block that turned peaceful neighborhoods into crime infested slums; the response from law authorities was harsh and immediate. Western countries are sometimes unfairly singled out for ‘racism’ toward different ethnicities, which is real in some cases, but in the bigger picture it is miniscule compared to other parts of the world. Having said all that, it must be appreciated that global demographics are changing and international standards of areas such as employment and immigration will be consolidated to reflect (dare say it) One World Order. We are transitioning into a world where there will eventually be a free flow of people across borders and countries, much like the free flow of information across the net.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.