Eric S. Margolis 2 March 2012

“Oh Lord Shiva, protect us from the fang of the cobra, the claw of the tiger, and the vengeance of the Afghan” old Hindu prayer

NEW YORK – Shock, incomprehension, fury. Americans are feeling these raw emotions as news keeps coming in of more attacks by Afghan government soldiers and officials on US and NATO troops. Six US troops were killed last week as a result of protests across Afghanistan following the burning of Korans by incredibly dim-witted American soldiers.

“Aren’t they supposed to be our allies? We are over there to save them! What outrageous ingratitude,” ask angry, confused Americans.
Angry Britons asked the same questions in 1857 when “sepoys,” individual mercenary soldiers of Britain’s Imperial Indian Army, then entire units rebelled and began attacking British military garrisons and their families. British history calls it the “Indian Mutiny.” Indians call it the “Great Rebellion” marking India’s first striving for freedom from the British Raj and the Indian vassal princes who so dutifully served it.

Britons were outraged by the “perfidy” and “treachery” of their Indian sepoys who were assumed to be totally loyal because they were fighting for the king’s shilling. Victorian Britain reeled from accounts of frightful massacres of Britons at places like Lucknow, Cawnpore, Delhi, and Calcutta’s infamous “black hole.”

As Karl Marx observed watching the ghastly events in India, western democracies cease practicing what they preach in their colonies. British forces in India, backed by loyal native units, mercilessly crushed the Indian rebels. Rebel ringleaders were tied to the mouths of cannon and blown to bits, or hanged en masse.

Today’s Afghanistan recalls Imperial India. Forces of the US-installed Kabul government, numbering about 310,000 men, are composed of Tajiks and Uzbeks from the north, some Shia Hazaras, and a hodgepodge of rogue Pashtun and mercenary groups.

Ethnic Tajiks and Uzbeks served the Soviets when they occupied Afghanistan as well as the puppet Afghan Communist Party. Today, as then, Tajiks and Uzbeks form the core of government armed forces and secret police. They are the blood enemies of the majority Pashtun, who fill the ranks of Taliban and its allies in Afghanistan and neighboring Pakistan.

But half the Afghan armed forces and police serve only to support their families. The Afghan economy under NATO’s rule is now so bad that even in Kabul, thousands are starving or dying from intense cold. Half of Afghans are unemployed and must seek work from the US-financed government.

But loyal they are not. While covering the 1980’s jihad against Soviet occupation, I saw everywhere that soldiers and officials supposedly loyal to the Communist Najibullah regime in Kabul kept in constant touch with the anti-Soviet mujahidin and reported all Soviet and government troops movements well in advance. The same thing occurs today in Afghanistan. Taliban knows about most NATO troops operations before they leave their fortified bases. Among Afghans, the strongest bonds of loyalty are family, clan and tribal connections. They cut across all politics and ideology.

Afghans are a proud, prickly people who, as I often saw, take offense all too easily. Pashtuns are infamous for never forgetting an offense, real or imagined, and biding their time to strike back. This is precisely what has been happening in Afghanistan, where arrogant, culturally ignorant US and NATO `advisors’ – who are really modern versions of the British Raj’s “white officers leading native troops”- offend and outrage the combustible Afghans. Those who believe 20-year old American soldiers from the Hillbilly Ozarks can win the hearts and minds of Pashtun tribesmen are fools.

Proud Pashtun Afghans can take just so much from unloved, often detested foreign “infidels” advisors before exploding and exacting revenge. This also happened during the Soviet era. But some Soviet officers at least had more refined cultural sensibilities in dealing with Afghan. US-Afghan relations are not going to flowers when American troops call the Afghans “sand niggers” and “towel heads.” Many US GI’s hail from the deep south. They are inundated by virulently anti-Muslim fundamentalist Christian propaganda that calls Islam the “religion of the Devil.”

Many Afghans have just had enough of their foreign occupiers. The Americans have lost their Afghan War. As the Imperial British used to say: you can only rent Afghans for so long. One day they will turn and cut your throat.

copyright Eric S. Margolis 2012

This post is in: Uncategorized


  1. Greenbean950 says:

    The US military has done a poor job of preparing for Afghanistan. I commanded an adviser team that was embedded with the Hungarians in Baghlan Province. We were advisers for an ANA infantry battalion. The NATO military units and the 10th Mountain brigade that arrived were all ignorant of Pashtunwali and other simple facets of Afghan culture. I expect many of the incidents of Afghans killing western soldiers were from simple insults that could have been avoided with the proper education. I don’t think it is possible for western armies to institutionally learn outside of maneuver warfare concepts. A few make the effort, but will not make waves and suffer career ending responses from other senior leaders.

  2. Pity what the U.S. has become.The hawks & Neo-Con Republicans are the very same type of people the U.S. used to oppose. America & Americans used to be seen as a pillar of all things good in the world,now they are almost universally reviled.
    It seems the U.S. and its useless politicians haven’t learned a damn thing from the debacle of Vietnam.Going to war with another country should be the absolute last resort when all other options have been exhausted.
    America should resort to the Teddy Roosevelt foreign policy of:”Walk softly and carry a big stick”

  3. What I said when America invaded Iraq still applies. “It is surprisingly easy to catch a bear. The hard part is when you try to hang on to it.”

  4. solum temptare possumus says:

    Why the Nato forces did not have their personnel take extensive detailed “sensitivity” training before stepping onto Afghan soil is incomprehensible and disrespectful to the Afghani people.
    Blunders like the burning of copies of the Qur’an, which the people believe is the Word of God, could have been avoided with better knowledge and understanding of the local culture.
    The sooner the Nato forces leave, the sooner these people will find their own methods to connect to the outside world. We have no right to impart our values on their culture. We must accept them as they are, even if it means that progress will be slow.

    as iudicium

  5. I have only a brief comment to make and that is…the outcome of the Afghan war (and Iraq) is very similar to what Mr.Margolis had predicted what would happen some 10 years ago.All one needs to do is go back and read this intelligent man’s comments back then.Just the other day,an American GI went on a nightly rampage and murdered innocent civilians…women and children.Is it any wonder why the Afghan people want the invaders out sooner than later?I can’t really blame these people and the Taliban for retaliating against this aggression against their people.I guess everyone should know by now why the slogan “Yankee Go Home” had originated.Unbelievable.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.