TIME TO BREAK THE AXIS OF SLEAZE
April 06, 2009
The global financial crisis that began on Wall Street has put the world in a surly, frightened mood. At least 25 million peoples have been thrown out of work by the made-in-USA crisis.
People around the globe are angrily blaming the international crisis on the United States and on their own leaders.  Politicians everywhere are in a panic as public unrest grows. 
 
Last week, leaders of the world’s leading industrial nations sought safety in numbers at the G20 summit in London to demonstrate they are taking positive action against the worst economic crisis since the 1930’s.  
 
Interestingly, at the same time, Adm. Dennis Blair, the US intelligence chief, warned the global financial crisis, not al-Qaida,  Taliban or assorted Muslim miscreants, pose the greatest threat to US national security.
 
As with many summits, the London G20 jamboree produced mixed results.
 
President Barack Obama and wife Michelle were a huge hit.  Obama came as a zephyr of spring after the winter of George Bush, who was probably the most hated man on earth since World War II. 
 
Obama urged Europe and Asia to join the US in spending more billions to stimulate their battered economies.  He even allowed that the US bore some of the responsibility for the current economic mess.  But Europe looked askance at Obama’s spending plans to date, and with good reason.
 
The US government and Federal Reserve have already spent, guaranteed, or lent  a staggering  $12.8 trillion to jumpstart the US economy, an amount equal to 90% of total US economic output in 2008.  
 
To aid the financial industry, the Fed slashed interest rates to nothing, punishing middle class savers and retirees. Unable to further lower rates,  the US government is flooding the economy with billions of dollars created from thin air that will inevitably generate future asset bubbles, stoke inflation, and eventually drive down the US dollar.    
 
By contrast, Europe, Russia and Japan resisted more stimulus deficit spending, rightly fearing inflation.  They have declining populations and cannot, like the US, saddle the next generation with monster deficits as the Obama team plans to do. 
 
Come to think of it, were not most of the people now running Obama’s financial `rescue’ the very same people who presided over Wall Street’s meltdown?  Like the wonderful Claude Raines in `Casablanca,’ they are now `shocked, shocked’ that such chicanery went on in Wall Street under their noses.      
 
France’s President Nicholas Sarkozy and Germany’s Chancellor Angela Merkel demanded more regulation of the international financial industry.  Europe and Asia blame America’s and Britain’s financial gamblers and fraudsters for the Panic of 08. Reckless borrowing caused this world crisis;  more massive debt hardly seems the correct  remedy.   
 
However, the G20 summit finally compromised on a $ 1 trillion more spending for the International Monetary Fund  and some more vague regulation. 
 
Particularly interesting were comments by Britain’s PM Gordon Brown that a new world economic order is emerging from the London summit.  Meaning: the days of total US economic hegemony are ending and a multi-lateral world economic order will replace it.   Given that Britain is a virtual US protectorate, Brown’s words were startling.  China also lost no time in rubbing salt into America’s bleeding financial wounds.
 
But this financial crisis won’t be resolve until the rotten US financial sector is restored to health, transparency, and integrity.  Many major US financial institutions are insolvent: their liabilities exceed assets.  Neither the bankers nor the Obama administration will admit it, or take necessary action.
 
That’s because the US financial industry has grown far too powerful.  Today, finance is America’s leading industry at about 24% of GDP.  Manufacturing has shrunken to 12%.  Wall Street’s `Masters of the Universe’ grew so rich they were able to buy or manipulate most politicians and government regulators.
 
Investment banks like Bear Sterns, Lehman, and Goldman Sachs routinely borrowed $20-30 billion daily, and  lent out US $35-50 per dollar of assets they owned (commercial banks generally were restricted to a 10:1 ratio). In what became known as the `carry trade,’ banks borrowed money at 1% and invested in billions worth of fraudulent subprime mortgages at 4%, netting 3%. 
 
Money was made from money, not productivity.   Hedge fund managers paid only 15% income tax while ordinary workers paid full taxes.  Investment became run amok gambling, as Wall Street used other people’s money to take death-defying risks and rake in billions.     
 
When this house of cards finally collapsed, the money men   used their clout to get both the Bush and Obama administrations to bail them out.  At the heart of the financial web dominating  America is the bank, Goldman Sachs.  Ironically, many of its alumni have been managing Bush and Obama’s  `rescue plan.’
 
In the outrageous, obscene AIG bailout, Goldman alone got US $12.9 billion from Washington, no-strings attached.  Barack Obama, John McCain, Hillary Clinton and everyone important in Congress received embarrassingly large cash contributions from Wall Street. Now, the money lenders are  trying to block meaningful financial reforms.
 
If US banks don’t admit their true losses, and if the White House keeps propping them up, they will become like Japan’s bankrupt `zombi’ banks in the 1990’s: dead men walking. 
 
The right answer is make financial institutions come clean and fire the fraudsters who ran them into the ground.  Then temporarily nationalize these banks and insurers and break them up into smaller firms that are not too big to fail.   The bankers, brokers, traders and credit rating agencies responsible for the greatest fraud in US history, the subprime and Alt-A mortgage scams,  should join crook Bernie Madoff behind bars.  
 
The panic of 08 laid bare just how much Wall Street controlled and manipulated the US government. The axis of sleaze between Wall Street and Washington’s politicians has to be broken.   But, so far, this is not happening. 
 
 
copyright ERIC S. MARGOLIS  2009   
Market Socialist
Monday, April 06, 2009 3:25 PM
Fantastic Article and a fore shadow of things to come.

The US government abrogated its constitutional right to coin money in favour of a debt currency issued in the form of Federal Reserve Notes. Until this issues is rectified, we collectively remain at the behest of the money changers.

As to Mr.Obama financial wizards. Mr. Summers, and Mr Geitner are the masters of financial alchemy. I am sure that Mr. Summers will do for the US what he did for the Baltic States.

Get ready for hyper inflation, the only way out of this is to start a war. The question remains who will be the target?

Calvin
Monday, April 06, 2009 4:57 PM
The U.S. plan, as I understand it, is spending more money to get out of debt. It doesn't make any sense. It's like John Q. Public going to the bank to borrow money to pay back a loan shark. It's a very short term solution to a long term problem. The importance of saving money now to get something later is lost on Americans. But Americans are not alone in this mindset. Canadians are just as bad. Everyone wants the nice home and fancy SUV now. I see people all around me borrowing themselves out of existence to have it all now. While I hardly feel sorry for the Yanks, Canada shouldn't gloat. We're not too far behind them.
ys
Monday, April 06, 2009 8:43 PM
- Double Post -

Admin, M. please make the cancel comment fuction work
ys
Monday, April 06, 2009 8:43 PM
Eric, bravo on an excellent article. I am particularly impressed that you d ug so deep you found the real answer to the problem of these monster banks: Break Them Into Smaller Pieces.

The complication that has arisen at the sheer size of these financial companies is what made it nearly impossible to regulate them. Add to that the sheer quantity of money they had and the relative cheapness of purchsing the US Legislature and you ca see how this crises of de-regulation rose eventually.

It is the recommendation to break up the banks especially that I am surprised and fond of. You see, ten eleven years back, when Microsoft was going through its major monopoly/anti-trust trial one of the recommendations was to cut up (break) Microsoft into smaller pieces. If that would have been done, maybe there would be some better GUI operating system in the market and some real money could be made in the operating system market rather than relying on freeware or buying vanity Apple OS. The scale of this banking crises is of course way bigger.

There is one more thing about breaking the banks into their constituent departments that is worth mentioning. I read about the option of Microsoft being broken up into smaller pieces in a Time magazine back in 1998. In it there was a picture of a smiling Bill Gates at his nerdy best, cut by a scissor into four pieces. This was an unconcscious attempt by a newspaper with a business friendly ideology to portray this plan as "bad". Now imagine if instead of the actual solution adopted (a cutesified Bill Gates wrapped in red tape) the world had seen Microsoft broken up into more smaller and more manageable pieces. We would have had some sort of better operating system by now; there would be serious competition in the Operating System (OS) market and something like Windows XP would have come out sooner. And the monster that is Vista would never exist. And maybe the heroin that is Halo and the X-Box would never have been invented.
We also wouldn't have to jack $80 - $200 into Bill Gates pocket every three years to run our computers. Moral: Break Up The Financial Institutions.

Break them up.
Rampart
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 12:02 AM

---[We would have had some sort of better operating system by now]---

We do. It's called "ubuntu" (Linux).

Once you try it, you won't go back to Microsnot again. And it's for free.
chatman
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 11:08 AM
Indeed, ubuntu is one of many great Windows alternatives out there. Though it's hard to dispute the Windows still rules the roost from a market-share perspective, the alternatives are pretty compelling, given Microsoft's latest disastrous product releases.

Rampart
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:09 PM

I use a dual-boot system because I still have plenty of software that I can't quite dump but which runs on Windows.

But with Ubuntu, you don't need to worry about getting a virus, you don't need to defrag, the look is far more configurable than Microsoft could ever have done, the computer runs like lightning, etc.

Just download, burn and try it out as a live-cd. Install it if you like it.

http://www.ubuntu.com/
Unknown Man
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 9:49 PM
You are too slow Mr. Singh. I don't know about chatwoman, but I have been using Ubuntu since the first release 4.10 in 2004. But thanks for informing the illiterate about one of the most popular Linux distributions. We would never have known about Ubuntu without you telling us.

What kind of computer are you using? I heard there is only one PC in all of pakstan and that is a 486 you got in a cultural exchange with the Chinese 20 years ago.

As for the Windows vs. Linux debate: I use both too and to me Linux is a piece of garbage. I have had far more problems with Linux than with Windows. Try Windows Server 2008 before deciding to dump Windows...that is if you can get it to run on your 486.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 3:39 AM

---[I have had far more problems with Linux ]---

Did anyone ask to hear of your stories of incompetence???


---[thanks for informing the illiterate]---

You're welcome.
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:06 AM
---[Did anyone ask to hear of your stories of incompetence???]---

Thus spoke the illiterate arrogant starving pak from behind his 486...

Your idiotic remark is typical of all those computer illiterates who think using Linux suddenly makes them a member of an elite group of expert computer users and that they are somehow elevated above the ignorant masses who are stuck with Windows.

Listen Mr. Singh, you might be new to the world of computers, living in pakstan (I don't blame you), but I have been using Linux since year 2000 and Windows since the early 1990s. I consider myself knowledgeable enough of both systems to know the strengths and weaknesses of both, and Linux has shown itself to be much more unstable, troublesome and plain annoying than Windows. Then again, what can you expect from a system developed by a bunch of amateurs in their spare time.

Now please jump back into the cave you crawled out from.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:28 AM

---[I consider myself knowledgeable ... and Linux has shown itself to be much more unstable, troublesome and plain annoying....]---

Again... did anyone ask to hear of your tales of incompetence?
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 11:32 AM
---[Again... did anyone ask to hear of your tales of incompetence?]---

Again...did anyone ask to hear the idiotic arrogant remarks of an illiterate starving pak posting from a 486???

Idiots like you are the perfect reason why control of the interwebz should be handed over to communist China.

Again, Windows is still better than Linux and your juvenile Microsft and Windows-bashing PLUS the fact that you are using a convenient Linux distribution like Ubuntu which is directly targeted as a Windows replacement for incompetent home-users, says a lot about your own incompetence. BUSTED! Real Linux professionals use Debian, Fedora, Slackware or SuSE; or even a Unix variant like FreeBSD. In fact, in most Linux communities Ubuntu users are frequently ridiculed by the pros. I know many Linux experts who constantly complain about weaknesses and deficiencies in Linux but just can't get themselves to use Windows because of their hatred for Microsoft. You on the other hand are still an illiterate fool.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:11 PM

---[Windows better than Linux... illiterate illiterate.... bla bla... me got skillz... bla bla... me expert, you not... but I can't make it work!... whaaaa ]---

Yet again.... WHO asked to hear of YOUR sad history of incompetence with Linux???

Nobody cares! LOL


Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:37 PM
---[But WHO asked to hear of your sad history of incompetence with Linux???

Nobody cares! LOL]---

And who asked to hear of your sad history of incompetence with Windows???

Nobody cares! LOL LOL LOL

I have encountered numerous buttholes like yourself on various message boards...just yet another of those frustrated arrogant Windows users who now thinks he is a member of an elite because he just woke up and decided to use Ubuntu...a Linux distribution targeted directly at incompetent Windows users like yourself.

Your laughable implication that one is incompetent because one has had problems with Linux shows your extreme level of ignorance. This is rooted in the arrogant belief that Linux is superior to Windows, which it is not. Let's take a look at Linux:

*Laughable scanner support.
*Poor webcam support. In fact, until a recent kernel update last year, most webcams did not work properly.
*With the exception of aMSN (an MSN Messenger clone) none of the other numerous instant messenger clients on Linux have audio or video support.
*Graphics drivers (both those from ATI and Nvidia) are slow and buggy.
*Horrible wireless internet support.
*Most Linux applications are of a very poor quality compared to the commercial applications available for Windows.
*The KDE desktop a direct rip-off of Windows Vista. Suffers from regular crashes and instability.
*The over-simplified Gnome desktop suffering from lack of innovation.
*The X.org graphical subsystem based on a horrible and antiquated architecture.
*Even the Linux kernel developers admitted that bugs are being added faster than they are being fixed.
*Etc...

No operating system is perfect. Get it into your thick arrogant & ignorant pak head.

You can keep repeating your idiotic remarks all night long. You are only revealing your own incompetence. I can already smell the small penis syndrome. Aren't you that paki poodle dog who spends most of his online time ridiculing India and boasting about paki military power? I don't blame you that it's your only source of pride when your country is bankrupt, your people are starving, and your government (just like that of South korea) does not dare go to lunch without U.S. approval.

I am still amazed how you manage to get online. I thought the islamic extremists in your country burnt all computers because computers and other modern technology is anti-islamic. If you behave I might send you some money so you can buy yourself some soap and a pair of shoes.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:02 PM
---[bla bla... I can spell "computer".... I can .. I CAN!!!!... my computer can beat up your computer!.. bla bla... India.. Pakistan... my dick... your dick.... bla bla]---

Take a tranquilizer and sleep it off.
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:03 PM
---[I use a dual-boot system because I still have plenty of software that I can't quite dump but which runs on Windows.]---

Ever heard of Wine? No, I guess you are too dumb and ignorant. Here is the link, you can thank me later: www.winehq.org

Using Wine many Windows applications and games can be made to run under Linux. And if you happen to have a Windows application or game that you can not get to run properly with Wine, contact the Wine developers and offer them your assistance as a coder. Write some code and report back. Then we will see how "competent" you are.

---[But with Ubuntu, you don't need to worry about getting a virus]---

Nonsense. There are numerous anti-virus programs available for Linux, and with good reason. Virus developers have been targeting Linux for several years now. In a hacking contest last year performed at a conference, a computer running Linux (Ubuntu!) was the first to fall. So much for Linux's security...

---[you don't need to defrag]---

Yet more ignorant nonsense. While it is true that journaled Linux file systems such as JFS, XFS or Ext4 do not get fragmented as easily as Windows's NTFS, they too do get fragmented over time and the problem is made worse by the total absence of proper graphical defraggers. All Linux file systems however do include basic text-based defrag utilities...again with good reason.

---[the look is far more configurable than Microsoft]---

Again, yet more subjective nonsense. Apparently you have not tried Windows Vista, Windows Server 2008 or the Windows 7 beta. If you want even more ability to configure on Windows, there are numerous third-party utilities available that can be used to tweak and modify every single aspect of the user interface.

---[the computer runs like lightning]---

So does a computer with Windows. In fact, on my PC Windows 2008 boots up twice as fast as Ubuntu or Fedora. Try upgrading your 486, that might help.

Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:20 PM

Just because you are too incompetent to run Linux (and stay on topic) doesn't mean others can't, you know.

So take it easy. The fault is not in you, but in your stars.

Having said that... who cares about your silly adventures of self-discovery on Eric's webapge??? I didn't notice anyone asking... or caring... about what you think. Nobody ever does, do they?

Perhaps THAT is your problem? Is THAT the source of your anger and frustration? LOL
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:25 PM
---[Just because you are too incompetent to run Linux doesn't mean others can't, you know.]---

Just because you are too incompetent to run Windows doesn't mean others can't, you know. I have been running Linux long before you even got your first computer. Linux is good for some things and Windows for others. I still prefer Windows for various reasons that are too complicated to understand for the limited mental capacity of your half-brained head. God...you are tiresome. Try getting a new line ok? You are just humiliating yourself.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:28 PM

---[I have been running..]---

Who cares what you do with yourself? LOL
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:30 PM
---[Who cares what you do with yourself?]---

I care, so there is at least one person who cares.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:32 PM

Masturbate elsewhere, thanks.
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:34 PM
---[Masturbate elsewhere, thanks.]---

Unlike you I don't masturbate and type one-handed. It must be difficult for you to type out your long ignorant rants with one hand.

As usual I win the argument and you lose. And Windows is still superior to Linux as proved from the way I debunked each and every single of your ignorant remarks about Windows. Don't blame me for being too incompetent to use Windows.

And obviously you care enough about what I do and what I have to say, since you constantly feel a need to respond and have the last word. So I should make a correction: there is only one person who cares apparently, and that's you.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:42 PM

Meltdown while masturbating! LOL
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:55 PM

As you can see, he has to have the last word, doesn't he?

I think it is now clear to everyone that "Unknown Man" is the same sad mental-case who was banned a dozen times from Eric's last forum. The very same nut who forced Eric to suspend the comments section last time.

Please keep an eye on this jealous little mental patient (who claimed to be from Iran). He is turning into a pest once again.

I have, of course.. for the good of the forum.... flagged his comments. Do with it what you will.

"Unknown Man"... would you like to add something? LOL
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:22 PM
---[As you can see, he has to have the last word, doesn't he?]---

And that is why you posted that comment right? Idiot.

---[The very same nut who forced Eric to suspend the comments section last time.]---

It takes two to start an argument.

---[(who claimed to be from Iran)]---

I am not Iranian and never made such a claim.


---[He is turning into a pest once again.]---

Unlike you who was a pest from the very beginning...constantly stinking up the forum with your incessant verbal diarrhea about India PakStan...india PakStan...like a small poodle barking at a bigger dog. *YAWN*

---[I have, of course.. for the good of the forum.... flagged his comments.]---

I also flagged all of your own comments. Bon Appetit.

---["Unknown Man"... would you like to add something? LOL]---

Keep going. I have all day. I am on vacation.
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:30 PM

Thanks for adding your piece, mental patient. LOL

Request deletion of all off-topic posts, Thank you, admin.
Unknown Man
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:31 PM
---[Thanks for adding your piece, mental patient.]---

You are not welcome.
Musaddiq Virk
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:39 PM
Hello, and welcome to the Psychiatric Hotline. If you are obsessive-compulsive, please press 1 repeatedly. If you are co-dependent, please ask someone to press 2. If you have multiple personalities, please press 3, 4, 5 and 6. If you are paranoid-delusional...
chatman
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 5:52 PM
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 6:03 PM

---[Feeding Hedagem... that's fortitude. ]---

I was wearing steel gloves while tossing him his bananas. LOL

Thanks for the name... "Hedagem"... it kept slipping my mind what this guy called himself before. I always knew it was him, just wanted everyone else and Margolis to see too.
chatman
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:15 PM
No prob. He's been calling himself a number of things, considering how often he's been banned. While history may soon repeat itself, I'm going to try and steer clear of these murky waters, and try to get back on topic.
topsy-turvy
Friday, April 17, 2009 8:33 AM
Hello Rampart aka Rimpart
Do ye remember me ? I'm salamscion came and made your record in 2005 in presence of ghawley
Plz don't let pak name down, u shud cum and give comments on what eric wrote above and discuss it the author topic instead of ur own win or ubu fight
Rampart u must controll ur comments, Eric has close his comment section b4 becuz of ur type of fools who tarnishing pk name. u've no knowledge of world affair esp financial affairs

topsy-turvy
Friday, April 17, 2009 8:36 AM
Hello Rampart aka Rimpart
Do ye remember me ? I'm salamscion came and made your record in 2005 in presence of ghawley
Plz don't let pak name down, u shud cum and give comments on what eric wrote above and discuss it the author topic instead of ur own win or ubu fight
Rampart u must controll ur comments, Eric has close his comment section b4 becuz of ur type of fools who tarnishing pk name. u've no knowledge of world affair esp financial affairs

cpserve
Wednesday, April 15, 2009 4:25 AM
actually i am going to have to agree with rampart on his theory of linux over windows because i run ubuntu linux yes it is lightning fast even on my old tower its lightning fast and i am able to use pretty much anything windows on it if i will with the downloaded feature i dont have to scurry to find drivers and what not and ive tried windows server 2008 waste of time went back to ubuntu plus the linux operating system is more secure then a windows operating system and the uptime on linux is more reliable then windows and i use to leave the tower on for weeks/months at a time with no crash but with windows i was crashing like every day it ate up so much ram blue screened on me many times my usb ports USB 2.0 dont work under windows works just fine in linux, I Was looking all over for an alternative and i would have to say ubuntu is the bomb plus Microsucks wants to much money for there buggy glitched crap they call an OS :) before a person such as your self knocks the ubuntu software and the linux community maybe you should do your research before you bash something right away i tell your fake you use windows and strictly windows i got a tower the darn thing only runs at 800mhz and only has 300mb of ram and ubuntu runs lighting fast it seems like it is up to par with my other tower that runs at 2.5ghz and 4gigz of ram. windows sucks linux is the bomb.
Trotsky
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 12:12 AM
I really don't understand how a rant about Bill Gates has much to do with the banks. And using name calling "nerdy" doesn't enhance your argument.
Rampart
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 12:30 AM
I am surprised you don't get it. I thought what YS said was obvious.

He is using Microsnot as an example to illustrate what should be done to the financial world. Many commonalities in the background there.
chatman
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 10:01 AM
Interesting parallel, but I don't think the absence of competition in banking is the problem; it's the collective power of the industry itself. The Microsoft case presents a single company dominating the OS business, and stagnating growth within that industry. The banking business does not suffer from a problem of innovation; indeed, some here would argue that there is too much innovation in the finance business. Rather, the problem is that the finance industry is too politically powerful overall.

Imagine, for example, that an important part of finance involves keeping the SEC out. This would involve hundreds or thousands of large and small players collusively 'renting' government regulators; how would breaking up the big institutions help prevent such influence peddling? I think there is an argument for saying that groups of institutions may more efficiently muster their resources than large, bureaucratic "megacorporations."

Wall Street banks contribute over 33% of America's tax receipts; it is an industry that makes itself a valuable constituency, regardless of how many individual banks operate within it. To the extent that it makes sense for the industry to avoid regulation, 8000 banks could collaboratively lobby government more persuasively than a single superbank (in a populist "democracy," 8000 voices are more superficially persuasive than a single "vested interest") . So I don't see how breaking them up would be helpful. Indeed, it might create a much larger regulatory headache, since the SEC would have so many baby dragons to tame.
ys
Saturday, April 11, 2009 1:38 AM
ys
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:33 PM
-- Comments Cannot Be Cancelled --
Rampart
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 4:52 PM
oldfan1
Monday, April 06, 2009 9:51 PM
For a further understanding to this excellent and forthright article from EM watch this interview of William K. Black conducted by Bill Moyers : http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/04032009/watch.html
Paul W
Monday, April 06, 2009 11:40 PM
I watched the Moyers/Black interview tonight. A well spent 30 minutes. It was refreshing to finally hear someone call them for what they are - criminals! It's too bad we live in a society where certain crimes are legal.

I doubt we'll see hyper inflation. The West is not going to turn into another Zimbabwe. it'll nearly kill them but they'll raise interest rates before allowing hyper inflation. The only question is: how long do we endure stagflation before we move to deflation and actually start to fix the problem? I know wishing for a depression sounds harsh, however you can't have two decades of phony growth fueled by credit without feeling some pain when the massive correction sets in. It's laughable to see world leaders telling us they can fix the problem painlessly. We need an economic collapse to clear out the toxic rot and to discover the true value of products and currency. A collapse also forces our leaders to take actions to prevent a future economic failure - buy us 80 years before we do it all over again. Instead we have our politicians simply trying to turn the clock back 2 years and get the credit flowing again.

A depression doesn't scare me - our actions have made it inevitable - what worries me is our leaders temporarily succeeding with all the money they're throwing at the problem. Creating a false dawn so they can begin their massive pyramid scheme all over again, just to have it crash even harder next time. Luckily their fraud is living on borrowed time and we'll see the next crash before they rip off too many more honest people.

Please remember: when people tell you to jump back into the stock market because it's a great time to buy, keep in mind the people telling you this are the ones like the Manulife CEO who made $13 million last year while every person with investments in Manulife lost money!
DoDaCanaDa
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 8:59 AM
///A depression doesn't scare me - our actions have made it inevitable ///

If you are anticipating it, and mentally/Spiritually preparing for it, you will be free from the fear that will cower most people. As the economic straight jacket tightens,a depression will not be the same as the Dirty 30s. There were not as many loose guns around then. Now they are everywhere in the USA.

Without Spiritual renewal, the rash of multiple murders of the last month will become the daily fare in the nightly news. Canadian Prime Minister Harper recently implied this is the greatest impending threat to ¨National Security.¨
Paul W
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 5:30 PM
DoDa, I agree with the end result but not the cause. I have a hard time picturing the era of Bonnie and Clyde and Dillinger to be the one without "loose guns". Two differences between the 30s and today: 1) America was a more moral country - only a decade or so out of the Victorian straitjacket. 2) Americans were used to hardship, as life was more challenging in those days(not to mention brutal labour practices) compared to the last 20 years which has seen a society spoiled like no other.

We do know Canada's threat to national security - the Conservative and Liberal parties! In the 1990s - with so much of our trade tied to the USA - did they seek out economic independence, like less trade with America and more with Europe and China? No they gave us NAFTA. Nice millstone around the neck. When the US goes down we'll be with them every step of the way. I wonder if by then the Canadian electorate will finally abandon our two fair weather free market parties and have the courage to vote for change?
DoDaCanaDa
Tuesday, April 07, 2009 6:55 PM
I agree with your points, Paul. Since the Law made it possible, no doubt the gangsters controlling booze had loose guns like the Mexican drug cartels, but it seems all the Americans have guns today, lacking the discipline of 1) & 2)

I view the Star of David as a simple symbol. It consists of two pyramids, one inverse to the other.

The upright pyramid is the society built on the principles of God-Peace, Love, Justice, Equality, Truth.

The inverse pyramid is the the society built on the love and service to money and things. That system is about to topple.

At best, government stimulus plans to cushion that impending fall they see coming should be called transition plans.
wolfgang
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 8:36 PM
Once again Mr. Margolis' column has made light of our western governments impotance to deal with big business in a heavy handed way. Since big business runs the show,governments are a dog with no teeth that has been nuetered for good measure,because the lawmakers have no b**ls to sand up to anyone ,except ordinary citizen who can't defend himself. And big business will do what ever it takes to maintain the cash flow. Remember folks! War is good for business. Historians can debate all they want about WW 1 & WW 2. My beleif is that they were engineered for one purpose only. To make alot of money for a few people. You can talk about human rights,and liberating and oppressed people.Look at where most of the major conflicts started in history. They either possessed some strategic value or economic value. In conclusion I would like to propose to all who commented on the this article to look at these videos Zeitgeist and Zeitgeist Addendum. You might not aggree with all the narrartor talks about,but I'm sure it will open some eyes. (Even yours Mr.Margolis!)
DoDaCanaDa
Wednesday, April 08, 2009 10:05 PM
It was not anything Roosevelt did that ended the Great Depression. It started with lend/lease, which was an economic boost , but ended up as WWII.

Having some imagination and reading between the lines of the Bible´s Revelation 18, it is a fairly accurate description of 9/11, which was hot fire and a warning.

As far as I see, the Israeli/Palestinian conflict, if not set on the right path, will be the flash point for the self-destruction of civilization as we have known it.

This will be a really hot WW III, over in an hour, thanks to the missiles we bought and paid for over and over again.
Shazam
Thursday, April 09, 2009 12:39 AM
Firstly, this was a below-par article by Eric so people, stop the feeble flattery. His lonely cry against the harm caused by the greedy guys who successfully embody the Spirit of America is a forlorn attempt to raise the consciousness of the uncaring. Eric, give it up - America is too far gone so figure out which Caribbean nation to stash your gold bars and live there happily ever after, assuming said island is not overwhelmed by rising sea levels caused by a dangerous model of progress.
Secondly, my guns turn to YS, who writes articles that are overly long. Please try to be more concise so I can bother to read your stuff, some of which demonstrates insight.
Next, the tiresome duel between Ram-Man and UN-known man. Un-known man, please stop insulting people on this board. Rammie, he is a mouse and you the cat - let him go for all our sakes.
Paul W and Chatman, I admire your fortitude and attempts to elevate the discussion. But this week, there is not much to be said. Eric is right as usual but really, America is flushing itself bye-bye and whatever repercussions this has globally will be what they will be because this thing won't turn around or turn out pretty no matter what, and no matter what nothing can be done about it, $ trillions or not.
OK, here is s.t. positive. Adm Dennis Blair has it right. I expect the recession to unravel societies that lack social cohesion. The each-person-for-his/herself USA is likely the first to go (as in Children of Men). Expect, dear citizens, kidnappings for ransom, shoot outs with cops, etc. as the have nots say "F-it" and take out their rage and desperation in violent (i.e. American) fashion. Maybe we'll live to see a net emigration from Hell's Kitchen.
Rampart
Thursday, April 09, 2009 1:04 AM

---[Rammie, he is a mouse and you the cat - let him go for all our sakes. ]---

Apologies about that. I assume all that exchange will be deleted... who wants that nonsense on their webpage?... so everything will look normal. I have great hopes when it comes to our Admin.


---[I expect the recession to unravel societies that lack social cohesion. The each-person-for-his/herself USA is likely the first to go (as in Children of Men). Expect, dear citizens, kidnappings for ransom, shoot outs with cops, etc.]---

Are you serious? Surely things aren't THAT bad?
LaFlannelle
Thursday, April 09, 2009 11:59 AM
Re: no more embargo on Cuba, all I can say is Hola!! Visited the island a couple winters ago and loved it, the people, the beaches - wonderful! Hopefully though, the US won't invade/ruin this paradise under the guise of 'bringing democracy to it'..... ;-(
Shazam
Friday, April 10, 2009 9:35 AM
Re Cuba - abolishing the Helms-Burton law would be a meaningful pull back from US imperialism re Cuba.
ys
Saturday, April 11, 2009 12:53 AM
ys
Saturday, April 11, 2009 2:53 AM
DoDaCanaDa
Saturday, April 11, 2009 8:26 AM
Here is a link I´m sure most of you will find interesting and relevant to this discussion.

http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=12955
LaFlannelle
Saturday, April 11, 2009 3:00 PM
Re: your pirate commentary: Considering the Yanks did a superb job of 'friendly fire' during the Battle of Lundy's Lane, (shredding their own men to pieces) I guess you'd have to remember the one, maybe two battles the US did win during the War of 1812 before hightailing it back behind the 49th.. One thing about the British, they knew how to fight, as Winfield Scott et al soon learned !
ys
Sunday, April 12, 2009 12:02 AM
Michael Chussudovsky and his ilk are nothing but Trotskyite conspiracy theorists.

If you want proper news, here: http://www.atimes.com

BTW I have had the misfortune of having Petras's textbook assigned for reading. It was good for background knowledge but the analysis was Stupid with a capital S.
DoDaCanaDa
Monday, April 13, 2009 9:02 AM
Perhaps you will give us a synopsis of the ¨good background knowledge¨ mixed in with the Stupidity?

I read about the ´economic tsunami´ to come on that site long before it hit the Global financial system and the term entered the public consciousness. You can see that time line for yourself going through past articles.

I also like the link you provided. Thank you.
Shazam
Monday, April 13, 2009 11:48 AM
Thanks for this link YS - it is a very good source of current events analysis and I have bookmarked it.
DoDaCanaDa
Monday, April 13, 2009 4:55 PM
I have no problem gleaning information from both Right and Left publications to make up my own mind.

I found the interview with Charles Freeman enlightening. When he was nominated to head the National Intelligence Council, the Israeli lobby was so vicious discrediting him, he withdrew his candidacy. This is from the link ys provided.

http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/KD03Ak02.html
There are currently 59 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category