DR RON PAUL HAS THE RIGHT CURE FOR AMERICA
WASHINGTON July 06, 2009
Republican Congressman Ron Paul became a hero to many Americans last year when he ran for president against the political establishment. The 11-term Texas congressman is the most respected and admired American politician around the world after President Barack Obama.
Rep. Paul is a vocal critic of what he calls reckless deficit spending, `welfare’ for big finance, and America’s foreign wars.  Paul’s voice has resonance: he sits on the powerful House Foreign Affairs Committee.  
 
Dr Paul invited me to Washington to address his  weekly luncheon held in his Capital Hill office about the intensifying wars in Afghanistan and Pakistan.  A group of independent-minded Republican congressmen attended. Many of them were deeply concerned by what they see as the nation’s economic and strategic misdirection.
 
During last year’s presidential race, I describe Dr. Paul as  `the only candidate who is telling Americans the truth about foreign affairs.’ Like the legendary Greek Cynic philosopher Diogenes looking for an honest man,   I came to deeply respect and admire  Paul’s courage, honesty, and his refusal to accept special interest money.  
 
Speaking of today’s US Congress, Dr Paul correctly observes: `Special interests have replaced the concern the Founders had for the general welfare.’
 
In fact, Rep. Paul has been a model of the type of legislators envisaged by America’s founding fathers: men of high moral standards and intellect dedicated to the nation’s wellbeing. He reminds me in many ways of the fiercely upright senators of the early Roman Republic.  The Roman Senate served as the model for the United States Senate.      
 
Paul, a physician, also used to deliver babies on Mondays and Saturdays while serving in office.  Interestingly, America’s  Founding Fathers envisaged being a member of Congress as a part-time job fulfilled by patriotic gentlemen.  Hardly what we see today where membership in Congress has become a caste system fueled by money and pandering to special interest groups.
 
The 74-year old doctor from Texas electrified young Americans with his grassroots campaign, providing voters a real alternative to the Republicans and Democratic establishment which often appears to be one party with two   factions. 
 
Paul’s clear, cool voice challenged all the government and media propaganda about Afghanistan and Iraq.  Dr. Paul is also waging a  determined battle against the runaway spending and soaring national debt being promoted by the Obama White House and Congressional Democrats.  Deficit spending, warns Paul, is leading the US to ruin.
 
Paul and his fellow libertarian Republicans advocate individual rights, strict adherence to the US Constitution,  limited government, and free enterprise. They oppose   American global domination, `nation-building,’ and all foreign wars not waged in the direct defense of American territory. In short, just what the early presidents of the United States urged.  
 
Paul opposes US involvement in other nation’s internal affairs.  As anti-Iranian hysteria gripped the nation last month, Paul was the only House member who voted against a bill condemning Iran for its recent election.  That’s real courage. 
 
`There is no area in which Republicans have further strayed from our traditions than in foreign affairs,’ writes Paul. He dismisses claims by neoconservatives that `we have to either fight them over there or over here’ as a `false choice.’ America has no business policing the world.  US foreign policy is undermining America’s national security, says Dr Paul.
 
Only Congress, he insists, has the right to declare war, not the president.  Congress cravenly abandoned this right during the  buildup to the Iraq War that was fuelled by the Bush administration’s shameless lies and  war-mongering by the US media.     
 
Dr Paul’s amiable manner and lack of the bloated self -importance that so typifies Washington bigwigs conceals a very keen intellect and depth of knowledge.  He also has one of the capital’s sharpest foreign affairs staff chiefs, Daniel McAdams.  It is a relief to find key decision-makers in Washington who actually understand the outside world.
 
As I talked with Dr Paul, it became evident to me that he and his fellow libertarians are  the potent remedy that the dreadfully sick Republican Party so desperately needs.  Paul’s Liberty Caucus will hopefully form the core around which a vigorous, new party grows that address America’s real needs.     
 
President George Bush and the neocons almost destroyed the Republican Party, as this columnist predicted  before the  2003 invasion of Iraq.  What’s left of the Republicans has become a rump dominated by Christian religious fundamentalists, Southerners, and war-loving neoconservatives that too often flirts with neo-fascism and racism.  
 
Today’s Republican Party is no longer a place for a moderate, life-long New York Republican like myself who considers President Dwight Eisenhower America’s finest modern president and believes in small government and avoidance of foreign entanglements, as the great George Washington urged in his farewell address.   In his farewell address, President Eisenhower warned Americans of the growing power of the military-industrial complex (now updated to `military-industrial-financial complex) and called for total nuclear disarmament.  
 
Republicans have also been suffering a series of lurid sex scandals by rural Romeos and hypocritical Christian moralists that have made its members look both extremely hypocritical and awfully stupid – not to mention the curious behavior of that would-be Alaska Joan of Arc, Sarah Palin. Meanwhile, extreme right-wingers like the odious Rush Limbaugh and former Speaker Newt Gingrich are vying to become the party’s voice.
 
Dr. Paul and his fellow libertarians offer Republicans and Americans a real alternative to the dumbed-down Republicans and to the wildly spending Democrats whose expanded Afghanistan war and reckless economic policies are leading the nation into growing danger.
 
But the problem remains that Dr. Paul and his fellow libertarian supporters are way, way in front of clouded and confused public opinion.  Hopefully, this will change.
 
 
copyright  Eric S. Margolis 2009
 
 
 
30 MARGOLIS      
 
          
 
 
       
 
 
 
 
 
 
Market Socialist
Monday, July 06, 2009 3:27 PM
Very good Article Mr. Margolis.

Dr. Paul is a credit to his office as is Dennis Kucinich. You had mentioned the early Roman Senate, unfortunately the US Congress is more a more going down the road that the Roman Republic did on its path to the Caesars and then the long decline. Madison and Jefferson would be out raged as I am at what has happened to the great Republic of the USA. Perhaps it is time that like minded North Americans (Americans, Canadians and Mexicans) carve out a piece of geography that reflects the intent and true nature of the aforementioned founding fathers.

Market Socialist
Monday, July 06, 2009 3:42 PM
One more comment,

"The 11-term Texas congressman is the most respected and admired American politician around the world after President Barack Obama. "

Dr. Paul is about to take the number one spot as Mr. Obama stature, in due time, will approach that of Mr Bush.
cleesburg
Monday, July 06, 2009 4:10 PM
Dr. Paul is indeed a model statesman! His ideas and service are highly needed to restore America's greatness. I salute you, Eric, for this excellent piece!
Shazam
Monday, July 06, 2009 11:44 PM
Doc Paul is not so much a model Republican as a model civil servant. We can have public service-oriented Democrats too. As a matter of fact, there are proportionately fewer public service-oriented Republicans because they are in the Party with the Me First philosophy.

I must say Eric your identification with the Republicans is soooo outdated - Eisenhower. Good Grief. Yes he was all of the good stuff you mention, but the Republican Party he represented and the words he spoke, like the words of George Washington that you repeat, is a distant memory, belonging to a land and time that existed long long ago.

Sad to have to break it to you my friend, but its time to refresh the identity screen.
Stormcrow
Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:51 AM
Dr. Paul and Mr. Kucinich are indeed the exceptions that should be the rule.

While various players cite Islamo-fascism, global terror and others as the fearsome enemies of democracy, the real enemy is democracy itself, or rather its inability to take truly corrective action when most needed. Every western democracy must come to understand that to continually split political hairs to protect ones powerbase when real, tangible action is needed to address problems is courting disaster. The financial crisis is a living, breathing example being played out before our eyes. Ten months in and there is yet to be any real reform, either in the US or Canada, and beyond. Fundamentally we are at a turning point where the ineffectiveness of politicians to take the complete action necessary irregardless of ideology is becoming the achille's heel of democracy. Voters will turn away from something that isn't working and choose whatever seems most expedient in order to make the changes needed or desired. Often this change comes in the form of a uniform or a religion, and once in place it could take ages to remove, and then only through pain and violence. I fear for democracy because its elected stewards (and their parties) have become lazy, self-absorbed and wholly negligent.

Market Socialist
Tuesday, July 07, 2009 5:11 PM
Very well put Stormcrow, I fear that you may correct.
Stormcrow
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 8:29 AM
Thank you MS! Best wishes...

ST
chatman
Friday, July 10, 2009 8:11 PM
Well put indeed... it really does ring true. It begs the question of whether there is any principled way to prevent institutional graft and laziness in large and successful political systems. It also makes wonder how the form of government can play a role in slowing a its movement toward incompetence.
WHITEHUNTER
Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:20 PM
Ron Paul was America's last hope. But instead they opt for people like Obama and Clinton. Doesn't say much for people,s mentality
BAK
Wednesday, July 08, 2009 7:08 AM
As always, a very nice article Eric,

@ "The 11-term Texas congressman is the most respected and admired American politician around the world after President Barack Obama": In all honesty, the stature of Obama is being grossly overestimated. America's political lackeys around the word may be singing his praises, then again they did the same for Bush, however, speaking for the Muslim world, and especially Pakistan, Obama for all thoughts and purposes is just another Bush, only more articulate, a better liar, and thus more dangerous. If what Eric has written about Dr. Paul is true, he has no business being compared to any of the leading American politicians especially Bush the Second.

Regards
Shazam
Thursday, July 09, 2009 9:35 PM
Would the Obama bashers among us kindly lighten up on him. He is, in my opinion, sincerely trying to build bridges with those whom Bush2 has alienated. You may be right about Mr. Obama in the long run, or you may be wrong. I think the window is still open to give him the benefit of the doubt.
rayyan
Friday, July 10, 2009 5:02 AM
The problem with the republican party is that its powerbase is made up of white,evangelical christian,and rural voters.By 2050,more than fifty percent of the Americans will be non-white.onefourth will be hispanics mainly Mexicans.The Mexicans still believe that the south western states belong to Mexico and were unjustly annexed by the gringos.The republican party is doomed to become a marginal party because of the US demographics.White Americans like other European are shrinking in number.
Stormcrow
Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:31 AM
Indeed, the Republicans are facing a numbers game that they just can't win unless they change. I'd say 'evolve' but apparently most of their number doesn't believe in such concepts. Obama has been a smash success when it comes to PR and image remaking, but there are so many things that need to be tackled, first and foremost the role of lobbying money and corporate influence in western policy making. Another thing that needs to be tackled, and a soon as possible, is how governments get their revenue. With every politican and their mother promising tax cuts that are unaffordable (given deficits and social committments) the current dynamic is on the edge of collapse. Governments must get a larger slice of their income from business activity, particularly the international financial sector, and pollution fines should radically increase. Call it a tax, call it a levy or tariff or what you will, but the fact remains current levels of personal taxation cannot support the existing model. One way to prevent future market bubbles is to increase taxes on acquisitions and mergers, international transfers and income from offshore (non-domestic) investments. And of course elect governments who will be much more concientious in closing loopholes and maintaining enforcement.
Stormcrow
Sunday, July 12, 2009 10:34 AM
Indeed, the Republicans are facing a numbers game that they just can't win unless they change. I'd say 'evolve' but apparently most of their number doesn't believe in such concepts. Obama has been a smash success when it comes to PR and image remaking, but there are so many things that need to be tackled, first and foremost the role of lobbying money and corporate influence in western policy making. Another thing that needs to be tackled, and a soon as possible, is how governments get their revenue. With every politican and their mother promising tax cuts that are unaffordable (given deficits and social committments) the current dynamic is on the edge of collapse. Governments must get a larger slice of their income from business activity, particularly the international financial sector, and pollution fines should radically increase. Call it a tax, call it a levy or tariff or what you will, but the fact remains current levels of personal taxation cannot support the existing model. One way to prevent future market bubbles is to increase taxes on acquisitions and mergers, international transfers and income from offshore (non-domestic) investments. And of course elect governments who will be much more concientious in closing loopholes and maintaining enforcement.
iPhone
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:30 PM
Ok, so I am whining. But why is it that authors/writers like Eric Margolis (or say Gwynne Dyer) are sooooo late in recognizing and hence speaking to situations that have been on the horizon since say, Ron Paul was delivering babies??

My point is...

1: Margolis is presumably intelligent, well informed and holds/expresses a believe system that we value, otherwise we would not be writing/whining. BUT, Ron Paul has been voting and speaking the same thoughts since time = 0 or the publication of his books.

So where was Eric Margolis last year when Ron Paul received a huge endorses in terms of money and attention in ANY forum that would allow him to speak???

Darn... where was Eric Margolis?

I saw Eric on TVO and CBC... I did not see Ron Paul.

Ron Paul was systematically maligned in alllll press in the US, and the much vaunted Canadian news media followed the American lead.

It is a little late to finally jump on the Ron Paul band wagon. It is shows no leadership on Margolis part. Only maybe a reflection of reality when the truth bites into the American landscape.

So Eric Margolis is finally on board with common sense (and certainly not the Mike Harris definition). It is about time then that Eric Margolis speak in detail about the Canadian / North American policies re: NATO; re: taxation and how that money is misspent; re: functional democracy.

Established authors such as Margolis have an audience of concerned readers. We would like to hear more. [With regard to Gynne Dyer well he is missing in action, I fear.]
iPhone
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:44 PM
Yes. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich are good politicians. What happened to the others?? It would appear that the 'others' were the infected with 'special interest' virus. In the clip below Kucinich speaks with Dr. Gratzer. The hard reality is that corporate America is disadvantaging Americans. It was apparent in the hearing and it is apparent to the people. Corporate America is/has been silencing what is good for public policy. I personally do not see a role for 'corporations' in government. Business can look after itself. Governments are supposed to be working for the constituents and the people. It is time that authors spoke directly to these matters because the current crop of politicians are unable to see this.

By the way, I would like to see George Galloway invited by Canadians to speak in Canada.
iPhone
Wednesday, July 15, 2009 10:46 PM
There are currently 17 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category