Destroying Pakistan to Make It Safe
Paris May 18, 2009
The US keeps kicking hornet’s nests around the globe and wondering why it continues getting stung.

                                                    

The latest example:  Pakistan’s once beautiful Swat Valley has been turned into a battlefield.  Last week, Pakistan finally bowed to Washington’s angry demands to unleash its military against rebellious Pashtun tribesmen of Northwest Frontier Province (NWFP) – who are collectively mislabeled `Taliban’ in the west.  They are not the Afghan Taliban, but it’s convenient fore the western media and Pentagon to slap that label on them.

The Obama administration had threatened to stop $1.2 billion annual cash payments to bankrupt Pakistan’s political and military leadership, and block $5.5 billion future aid, unless Islamabad sent its soldiers into Pakistan’s turbulent NWFP along the Afghan frontier and crushed attempts to re-establish Islamic Law and autonomy. Many people in the region want Islamic law because in utterly corrupt Pakistan it represents the only honest and swift judicial system.  The only other `law’ available has to be bought.

Pakistan’s army and air force claimed to have killed 1,000 `terrorists’ (read: mostly civilians) and almost emptied the valley of its inhabitants. UN sources now say the operation has created close to 2 million refugees.

Pakistan’s armed forces, who are being paid by the US to fight Pashtun tribes, have scored a brilliant victory against their own people.   Too bad Pakistan’s military does not manage to do as well in wars against India. Blasting civilians at home, however, is much safer and more profitable.

Unable to pacify Afghanistan’s Pashtun tribes (again, lumped together as `Taliban’), a deeply frustrated Washington has begun tearing Pakistan apart in an effort to end Pashtun resistance in both nations.  CIA drone aircraft have so far killed over 700 Pakistani Pashtun. Only 6% were militants, according to Pakistan’s media,   the rest civilians.

Pashtun, also improperly called Pathan, are the world’s largest tribal people.  Fifteen million live in Afghanistan, forming half its population.  Twenty-six million live right across the border in Pakistan.
Up to three million Afghan Pashtun are refugees in Pakistan.

True to their strategy of divide and rule, Britain’s imperialists split the Pashtun by an artificial border, the Durand Line (which became today’s Afghan-Pak border). Pashtun reject this artificial border.

Many Pashtun tribes agreed to join Pakistan in 1947 provided much of their homeland remain autonomous and free of government troops. Pashtun Swat, where Islamic Sharia law was in force, only joined Pakistan in 1969 after assurances of autonomy and religious freedom.

As Pakistan’s Pashtun increasingly aided Pashtun resistance in Afghanistan, US `Predator’ drones began attacking them. Washington forced Islamabad to violate its own constitution by sending troops into Pashtun lands.   The result was the current explosion of Pashtun anger.

I have been to war with Pashtun and have seen their legendary courage, strong sense of honor, and determination. They are also hugely quarrelsome, feuding, prickly, and notorious for seeking revenge.  .
One learns never threaten a Pashtun or give him ultimatums. These mountain warriors defied the US by refusing to hand over Osama bin Laden because he was a hero of the anti-Soviet war and their guest. Doing would have violated their ancient code of `Pashtunwali’ that still guides them.

Now, Washington’s ham-handed policies and last week’s Swat atrocity  threaten to ignite Pakistan’s second worst nightmare after invasion by India: that its 26 million Pashtun will secede and join Afghanistan’s Pashtun to form an independent  Pashtun state, Pashtunistan.

This would rend Pakistan asunder, probably provoke its restive Baluchi tribes to secede, and might tempt mighty India to intervene military, risking nuclear war with beleaguered Pakistan.

The Pashtun of Northwest Frontier have no intention or capability of moving into Pakistan’s other provinces, Punjab, Sindh and Baluchistan.  They just want to be left alone.  Alarms of a `Taliban takeover of Pakistan’ are driven by ignorance or propaganda.

Lowland Pakistanis have repeatedly rejected militant Islamic parties. Many have little love for Pashtun, whom they regard as mountain rustics best avoided. Pakistan’s Islamist parties have traditionally won less than 10% of the national vote.

Nor are Pakistan’s well-guarded nuclear weapons a danger – at least not yet.  Alarms about Pakistan’s nukes come from neoconservative fabricators worried about Israel.

The real danger is in the US acting like an enraged mastodon, trampling Pakistan under foot, and forcing Islamabad’s military to make war on its own people.  Pakistan could end up like US-occupied Iraq, split into three parts and helpless.

If this continues, at some point nationalistic Pakistani soldiers may rebel against the corrupt generals and politicians on Washington’s payroll.

Equally ominous, a poor people’s uprising spreading across Pakistan – also mislabeled `Taliban’ - threatens a radical national rebellion similar to India’s spreading Maoist Naxalite rebellion.

As in Iraq, ignorance and military arrogance continue to drive US Afghan policy. Obama’s people have no understanding what they are getting into in `Afpak’ than did the Bush administration.  They will learn the hard way.


copyright Eric S. Margolis 2009

ys
Sunday, May 31, 2009 12:32 AM
This article just had the wrong thrust anyway.

Eric, do you have to be totally insecure?

You actually succeeded in Ramparts objective of shutting down the comments section. Thats sad.
sheba69
Wednesday, June 03, 2009 9:47 AM
The Pashtuns are time honored and tested since the days of Alexander the Great.They may be called rustics,islamist and a variety of slurs,but bear in mind their hearts are strong as the rocks they inhabit and once a friend, the seal of infinity and gold is something to cherish for life.Their muddles are long standing and eternal, but never have they poked their noses elsewhere.The only fault visible is their resolute insistence for proof which is the mainstay of Democracy as well the tenets of Islam.Stop tethering Pakistan into an abyss of destruction and back off, PLEASE
Nayyar Hashmey
Tuesday, July 14, 2009 7:55 AM
EM writes what is truthful about the current state of affairs in Pakistan. The only thing I differ with him is: when he says the mainland Pakistanis remain indifferent to the Pashtuns. I do beg to differ from EM’s views in this regard.

There are large swathes of Pashtun settlements in different parts of Pakistan. Baluchistan has a sizable population of Pashtuns, resultantly in the past some Pashtuns did demand a separate province for the Pashtuns there. This demand, though a muted one, never got the favor either in Balochistan itself or of people in other provinces.

The ethnic settlements in all four provinces of Pakistan are so intermingled with the mainstream populated majorities that it would tantamount to opening a Pandora’s box in almost very province of Pakistan. Unlike India where the nationalism is Hinduism plus love for the Indian homeland, in Pakistan it is Islam plus the soil of Pakistan, a homeland for all populations living in this country. So to call the Pashtuns as demanding for Pashtunistan is rather an unasked for comment because this stunt was started by the former King Zahir Shah and abetted by India, which, however, never found any favor or support from the Pashtuns of Afghanistan. It was this very factor which deterred the then Afghan king to stay neutral when a war started between India and Pakistan (in 1965). Although the king then, did wish to side with India to extract concessions from Pakistan on the Pahtunistan and other issues, yet having sensed his people being adamant to such a support for the Indians, he remained neutral (per force though, not voluntarily).

Otherwise EM is correct in his assessment and analysis of the situation prevailing currently in Pakistan. Some times we in Pakistan are led away with our sentiments and try to close our eyes. I myself support our army for its operation against the so called Talibans in northern Pakistan, yet I do believe Pakistan’s armed forces should have taken such an initiative after taking directions from the people of Pakistan and not the United States of America. (This could have been done through an open debate and or in camera session of the parliament and once a consensus was reached; taking all pros and cons in to consideration, then it would have been a more logical and a result oriented operation). It will be foolish to overlook the plight of 3 million refugees languishing in refugee camps of Mardan (God knows how long they will have to stay there and what will be their reaction after living in a hapless condition such as refugees’ (within their own homeland).

US even under Obama is still under a strong influence of NeoCons. These NC’s who are holding very important positions under Obama have their own roadmap for a NEW World Order which we should not forget.

If EM says something in long tern interest of Pakistan and an enduring peace in the region, we think he is opposing the army and Pakistan. He is a well wisher of Pakistan (well I think so) but if he speaks truth which sometimes is not to our liking we start branding him “wrong”.

There are people who claim being close to Pashtuns and then slander a down-to-earth analyst just because they cannot read between the lines, it’s not EM’s fault, such people need to read perhaps his article again and again so that they can perceive the real message he wishes to pass on to the concerned quarters (who very well know what he means by “Destroying Pakistan to make it safe”.

Nayyar Hashmey
wondersofpakistan.wordpress.com/
WWW.IMRAN.TV
Thursday, September 03, 2009 1:39 PM
Eric

I respect your opinions, even though I may not agree with all of them. One important thing you deserve credit for is keeping attention on Pakistan, a stalwart US ally oft used and disposed off like a used napkin.

Nayyer earlier made a good comment, and most of Pakistan feels the pain and suffering of the Pashtuns or the Baloch people, at the hands of AlQaeda as well as their own tribal leaders. These people may have hearts of Gold and bravery but sadly it only kicks into action against those coming to help them. They rarely rise up against their internal tyrants who keep them locked in the stone age. That is sad.

Sincerely

Imran
IMRAN.TV
http://www.imran.com/media/blog/
There are currently 4 comments
Comments Commentaries
Currently Ordered By:
Commentaries by Category